swa #11

Some of these articles were definitely more credible than the others. The article I felt was the most credible was "What Did Not Work: Effort to Centralize Homeless Services". The article goes into a lot of detail about the Four Corners of Hope and why it failed. If someone was writing a paper on the issue they would have a lot of very useful information. The author even divided the article into different sections, which helped him break down what he was trying to say and make each point stronger. I think the least credible article would be "Four Corners Best Answer on Homeless". It is a very short article and only talks about where the location on shop road is goin to be at. It doesn't talk much beyond that about the actual facility, just what its goal is to do. You could use it in a paper, but you wouldn't get much out of it. You can check the credibility of an article by when it was published and who it was published by. If no one has ever heard of the author then it may not be very credible, but if its someone who has written many other credible sources then its probably another credible article. You can use small pieces from a less credible article, you just don't have to use a lot of information from it.